ChatGPT account ban caused users to revolt

ChatGPT account ban complaints are increasing. Users, including $200 monthly Pro subscribers, say they cannot access their accounts without any warning.

OpenAI's productive artificial intelligence platform ChatGPT has recently come to the fore with account closures implemented without any prior notice. Many people, including Pro subscribers who pay $200 per month to the platform, state that their access to the system was suddenly cut off and all their accumulated chat history was deleted. The support mechanisms that users use to object to the situation give a negative response within minutes, causing reactions to grow.

Unjustified Blocking and Rejected Objections

Details shared in developer communities reveal the scope of the sanctions. In a case reported on OpenAI's official developer forum on November 7, a subscriber using the Pro package reported that he encountered an "account_deactivated" warning when he tried to log in to the system. Stating that he had not received any rule violation warnings before, the user suspects that the fact that he used VPN networks of different countries to access Codex and ChatGPT may have caused this situation. Another subscriber who expressed a similar grievance on Reddit reported that his account was closed because it was associated with a different profile that was previously suspended, and that his official application was rejected within just an hour. On November 8, when the complaints continued, another subscriber, who stated that he had been making regular payments to the platform for four years, announced that two separate objection records he created were rejected by automatic responses in a few minutes and one minute, respectively.

Loss of Trust and Disruptions in Support Processes

The fact that even professionals who pay high subscription fees face similar sanctions has created serious concern for users who integrate business processes with artificial intelligence tools. The fact that support units directly convey rejection decisions with ready-made template messages, instead of examining the cases in depth, strengthens the suspicion that the control mechanisms are carried out through algorithmic bots. The unilateral deletion of all historical data and the fact that objection channels are virtually ineffective shake the trust of professionals who entrust their commercial projects to this infrastructure.